Re: Acceleration's higher orders

Liste des GroupesRevenir ร  p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Acceleration's higher orders
De : oaa (at) *nospam* kieaw.pl (Andrea Krakowski)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 24. Apr 2024, 16:11:47
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v0b7fj$80k5$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
J. J. Lodder wrote:

gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
William O. Davis analyzed the system which was referred to by John W.
Campbell, Jr. as "the fourth law of motion" - i.e., jerk.  Davis and G.
Harry Stine got together and tested the invention.  They hung it from a
wire and oriented it so the supposed thrust would be horizontal.  There
was no net thrust.  The "weight loss" was due to nonlinearities in the
bathroom scales because of the thumping around of the weights.
 
Yes, a mistake that is made over and over again.
There was some ado some time ago about some students who had put a
gyroscope on a precision 'balance'.
They noticed a change of weight that depended on the sense of rotation.
Apparently the bearings are smoother in the direction in which they are
normally run, producing less vibration to rectify, Jan

nonsense, the center of mass is moving along the axis of rotation, which is a fact. See a doctor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum#/media/File:Greater_Germanic_Reich.png

๐—ง๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—”_๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐——_๐—ฃ๐—ง._10_-_๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜_๐— ๐—”๐—ก๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง,_๐—ง๐—›๐—˜_๐—š๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—˜๐——_๐—”๐—š๐—˜_2022-04-22 https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/jgztuv98EroM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * Re: Acceleration's higher orders17Volney
9 Mar 24 `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders16hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
9 Mar 24  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar 24  +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders12Ramiro Juรกrez
10 Mar 24  i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders11Ross Finlayson
10 Mar 24  i `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders10Ismael Balazowsky Homutov
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Bonny ฯ‡ฯฮฎฯ„ฮฑฮน ฮœฮฑฮนฮฑฮฝฮดฯฮฏฮฟฯ…
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Lou Bodnรกr Sรกrkรถzi
20 Mar 24  i  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders7Ross Finlayson
21 Mar 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Olden Ibuka Yokokawa
7 Apr 24  i   +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders3Ross Finlayson
24 Apr 24  i   i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2bertietaylor
24 Apr 24  i   i `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1bertietaylor
23 Apr 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24  i   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2J. J. Lodder
24 Apr 24   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Andrea Krakowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal