Re: Scalar waves

Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 04/27/2024 10:46 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:

Is this somehow correct?
(The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I
had assumed something similar before.) TH

>
It only goes backward, if at all: zero, so, ....
 
What that models is that there is a region, all the region of the
affected course of the wave, that is a "locale", that is a locality, and
that according to observer effect and "real wave collapse", of a
superclassical wave of a locale an extended region, that the "real wave
collapse" is "superclassical flux", i.e. instantaneous.

you talk nonsense, that's a fictitious "locale" since locale doesn't even
exists. Here's more info for you to undrestand. What is been said in
relativity so many times before, the fucking putina is a fucking traitor.

𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗲,_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗨𝗻𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰_-_𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹_𝗖𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴_𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀
https://bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69deo/qzfe1tcU0qxR