Sujet : Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate
De : pt (at) *nospam* prrpoxr.pt (Patric Romão)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 11. May 2024, 22:18:05
Autres entΓͺtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v1onac$1a0ff$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Evolution/2.32.3 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0)
gharnagel wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
Well, yes.
But actually the measurements of a remote observer, passing by at
significant velocity, is irrelevant (at least for the rod).
So, it's all BS we're talking about? TH
But everything is remote to an observer, even his instruments may be
remote. There is always time delay between you and the rest of the
universe, it's just that it is insignificant in many cases, for the
purposes being investigated.
you are a puppet regime. Amazing how people like being a pupped regime,
year 2024. You stole that country 100% for sure.
π£ππ’π§π’π¦_ππ’ππ_1803_πͺπ’π₯ππ¦_2023-11-25_-_π π¬_ππ¨π‘ππ_ππ₯πππ_(π©ππππ’)
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/5e9XjCjrRrTA
Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate
Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate