Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent
De : qckhi (at) *nospam* oafst.gr (Francis δουλεύονται)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 25. May 2024, 23:25:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v2tohm$1afdt$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1
User-Agent : 40tude_Dialog/2.1.14.24
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second
loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in the
time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

you dont undrestand. That second is based on a oscillation which is too
long. A smaller duration oscillation proves the longer wrong. That's why
the smaller is better.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 May 24 * Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent3Francis δουλεύονται
26 May 24 `* Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent2Devan χωροκεντρομένο
26 May 24  `- Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal