Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 13:41 schrieb Richard Hachel:Ich sagte, Sir, dass das Photon keine Existenzmöglichkeit habe. Es handelt sich lediglich um ein augenblicklich übertragenes Energiequantum (im Bezugssystem des Empfängers, aber nicht im Bezugssystem der Quelle, selbst wenn diese komobil und stationär sind).Le 06/07/2024 à 07:04, Thomas Heger a écrit :Sorry, but I understand only very little French ( a little but, but not much).Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor:C'est intéressant.Conservation of charge is the only conservation law.>
Rest is bollocks.
>
I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'.
>
Actually I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom, while the photon flies away in a streight line.
>
The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy:
>
in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet).
>
If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron.
>
A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain aspect of a standing 'rotation wave'.
>
The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point 'proton'.
>
If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon.
>
And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron.
>
Therefore: charge is not conserved.
>
>
TH
Sauf que j'ai toujours dit que "the photon doesn't exist".
So, please, say it again, but in English.
(german would be ok, too, but I guess you don't speak that).
TH
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.