Sujet : Re: Energy?
De : vvll (at) *nospam* lhvvec.ru (Verdell Muklevich Fung)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativitySuivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 05. Aug 2024, 00:42:29
Autres entรชtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v8p3l4$776s$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : MicroPlanet Gravity/2.7
gharnagel wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 18:33:54 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
If your theory is fundamentally grainy and discrete,
it might as well be empty.
Why wouldn't continuity be just as empty? The human mind just can't
grasp action-at-a-distance, so fields were -- invented. In Q.E.D.,
Feynman asserted that light is -- particles. Particles communicate
between discrete grains over distances, but the math for that is very
complicated.
That's why fields (and QFT) were invented. They are simplistic (?)
approximations to reality
no shit Sherlock, fields are there before quantum, Newtone and everything,
due forces, say gravity, electrostatic, magnetism etc. These persons
doesn't know what fields are. In physics.
๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป_๐ ๐ฎ๐_๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ_๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐น_๐ผ๐ป_9๐๐ต_๐ผ๐ณ_๐๐ - they are asking for it
https://old.b%69%74%63%68ute.com/%76%69%64eo/zw8tWZpys3JP/
Energy?
Re: Energy?
