Sujet : Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
De : ad (at) *nospam* ufrvr.ru (Fransico Dudorov)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.mathSuivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.mathDate : 29. Mar 2025, 09:42:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vs8bq3$sf95$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
x wrote:
and global vacillate like Mirimanoff’s forcing in set theory.
There is also semantics.
So the ancient 'atom' was 'that which can not be cut'?
Yet when they found that they could 'fission a nucleus' they were
already set on what the more modern terms meant.
not entirely true, but you make a point. What atom is not particle to be
cut in 2, but plainly probability distribution. Fully consistent with my
paper "𝙊𝙣_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝘿𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙩_𝙈𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧_𝙤𝙛_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙈𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙆𝙤𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨_𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙡".
I like it so very much. The Einstine relativity is a little child compared
to my paper. Here some proofs
𝙄_𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚_𝙉𝙀𝙑𝙀𝙍_𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙣_𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧_𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣_𝙨𝙞𝙩_𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣_𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚_𝙁𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚’𝙨_𝙁𝙞𝙧𝙨𝙩_‘𝙇𝙖𝙙𝙮’_𝘽𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚_𝙈𝙖𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙣_𝙙𝙤𝙚𝙨...
https://%62i%54%63hute.com/vi%44eo/KHXn1KanjoFE