Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)

On 03/29/2025 10:09 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 3/29/25 10:24 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

for example that gonads have grey matter and sometimes do some
thinking, the idea is that here we're talking about a somewhat
larger concept than, "Physfit's dick",

>
>
>
How do you know how "large" Physfit's dick is?  I have groupies here in
sci.physics that have pondered on it for 25 years (this is true!) and
have not figured yet what's the extent of its largesse in providing what
they all lack in life. Some of them died figuring it out!
>
"Primal lingam"?.. Shiva would roll on the ground for it like Netanyahu
does for every $10B you pump into his ass. And how is that rolling? It's
the type of pirouette where spotting technique is used, or Chaînés, if
you will, to maintain direction. Only, it is done while rolling on the
ground in absolute servitude and joy, not while turning in a standing
position.
>
The face momentarily pauses when looking at you while body is still
turning.
>
Your Shiva would do that kind of rolling, down there on the ground,
underneath Physfit's dick.
>
You, Kosmanson, might one day die, still figuring Physfit's dick out.
Has happened before, may happen again :)
>
>

Nah, here it's more like Anne Conway's than your prison sex.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conway/
Funny, my name is Conway, too.
"What's the funniest thing that can happen to a cruel sadist?"
"I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it's bad."
Otherwise your Kosmanson seems a reasonable sort of romantic poet,
it's not my study yet the ladies seem to like it.
Or, like Heidegger, Heidegger went way overboard about Hoelderlin,
Heidegger was an inconstant flake and turned over about every which way.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1970/11/19/the-riddle-of-holderlin/
Kosmanson's much more sort of a Coleridge than a Hoelderlin, as a poet.
And Heidegger was a fat little hypocrite.
Anyways why this is relevant to sci.math, sci.physics,
sci.physics.relativity, is because Kosmanson waxes on the
concepts related to _theory_, necessarily, what with regards
to what's called _modern_ theory, then with regards to the
"paleo-classical and post-modern", theory, about foundations,
mathematics' and physics'.
Of course there's not yet much to it, yet you keep coming up
with more quotes of Kosmanson, then we'll just kind of pick
the trashy bit and figure that's from you instead,
make yours the victim, then read some Kosmanson.