Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 02. Apr 2025, 21:07:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vsk5dp$mtq0$3@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/2/25 2:54 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/2/25 2:50 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
As expected, Trump has quietly agreed to only indirectly communicate with the Iranian government. Via Omman.
>
Whatever happened to the Swiss embassy in Tehran, playing that role for so long? .. :-)
>
Hehe :)
>
I think Iranians kicked those Swiss Bitchy asses out of the way as soon as Switzerland became nothing but another USA's Bitch little country.
>
You will hear of Iran less and less now, and if you ever do, it would be likely just some more bullshit for the Sheep. It's been decades like that.
>
If you want to read the real docs to know what Trump's admin is communicating with Iran, wait 30 years for them to become available to you. Hopefully you won't read them in Greenland, the only part of USA that will still exist (too cold for Blacks and Native American cannibals). But that doesn't mean next time he gets rude, Iranians won't disclose it.
>
In fact today, the head of the political faction of the Militia, announced that "threatening" itself can be taken as cause for redefining Iran's non-nuclear stance, "and it would be obvious what that means," he said.
>
Not that this is that important, these are just talks. Blabbers for people to read and get fooled. The actual defensive measures had already been taken a long time back, in late 1990s. By the introduction of "Hoot" torpedoes early after the year 2000 into Iran's Navy, this matter was already over! Those weapons only work with nukes. There was a brief stop in further development of nukes into forms delivered on other devices, in Iran, when Bush (the son) made a deal with Iran that in exchange with Iran's stopping the work on nukes, he will get rid of Saddam's government. Iran accepted it, so in a way was part of the "coalition", and the work from then on was genuinely reduced to stuff about creating various medications with nuclear material and some other industrial uses.
>
Then after Saddam was overthrown, that Bozo, Rumsfeld, who had militarily helped Saddam in the war with Iran in the 80s, happened to threaten Iran some day on the deck of one of the carriers in the Persian Gulf. Old habits in old dogs.
>
Iran immediately took that as the violation of the agreement with Bush and began continuing the work on nuke developments full speed again. To this day! A lot of scientists and engineers got back to their jobs that day. That's how Iranians got to know what happened and why. I think Rumsfeld effectively lost his job for the blunder.
>
The scientists and engineers are all retired now, and a huge community of physicists and engineers have taken their places, certainly magnified in numbers greatly, but to what degree, remains secret.
>
In November of 2023 when the systematic mass murder of the people in the region began by USA and Israel, their long term Nazi designs came into open, and very soon a large number of Iranian physicists and engineers traveled to Moscow to get trained on building H-bombs (you can dig news of it out - back then I found two news pieces after some searth). So my best guess is that Iran has had thermonuclear bombs for more than a year now. A few must've been brought over to work on from that stage to develop better ones. Iran has always done that with defensive weapons pretty successfully. Iranian made weapons are cheaper, and at the same time as effective in their main purposes, with many other bonus features added to tackle other tasks if necessary.
>
Plus, a few of missiles that Iran has since developed only makes sense if used with nukes. So it is not just torpedoes that are equipped with nukes. But the Hoot is Iran's main defense regardless, because no carrier in the world can come close enough to Iran's shores to cause much damage to the country. And these torpedoes can be launched with just about anything, even from the sky.
>
Another clue. Last week, immediately after Trump amassed attack equipment in Diego Garcia island, Iranian military planes began delivering "certain military weapons" to Sudan and Venezuela!.. Some for possible attack on Diego Garcia forces, and some for possible attack on mainland USA if that crap becomes necessary, and depending on what this mad man in White House had (and has) in mind. Dig this out in the news. I read it in a Telegram news channel with pictures of the planes and everything.
>
One of these planes tried to go to Lebanon but the Lebanese government at the last moment changed heart and prevented it from landing. Probably Israeli pressure. But Israel, almost as easily, can be nuked from Iran too; it doesn't have to involve Lebanon.
>
Then I read what the deputy head of Milita's Navy said in a rare interview. He said "If an American Navy ship or carrier engages in an attack on Iran, we can destroy them even if they manage to escape to Gulf of Mexico!"..  This points, again, to what Iran delivered to Venezuela a few days back.
>
So this news bit alone, the reaction of Iran to Trump's threats and building forces in Diega Garcia, clearly shows that the matter of "nuclear" talks are pure bullshit. Nukes have been a done deal in Iran for decades.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
  Here is a Russian source of the recent news above:
 https://en.topcor.ru/58239-dostat-do-ssha-iran-formiruet-udarnyj-potencial-v-venesujele.html
Note that the Russian article has mangled the numbers in it, I don't know for what purpose. The "50" that Iran's Militia head of Air Force said was 50 thousand which is the best estimate of number of American soldiers encircling Iran's borders. And distance of Diego Garcia island to Iran's shore is about 3200 km, hence the need to use Sudan to launch attacks against.
Anyway, nothing will happen of course. I mean nothing other than Trump fucking more and more things up to the detriment of Americans, as the gist of the Russian article is about also. Trump's poker game bullshit only makes _real_ NON-BULLSHIT negative results for Americans. So live with it.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)64Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)58Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9%
12 Mar 25  i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25  i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4%
13 Mar 25  i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25  i i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25  i  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)41Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar 25    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)31Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25      +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr 25      i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 25      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)22Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25               `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25                `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25                 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25                  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25                   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25                    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
12 Apr05:15                     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)11Physfitfreak
12 Apr05:29                      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
12 Apr18:35                       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
12 Apr22:09                        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
13 Apr02:49                         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
13 Apr16:47                          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
14 Apr19:09                           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
14 Apr22:08                            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
14 Apr23:29                             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
15 Apr16:53                              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Apr02:38                               `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal