Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 14. Apr 2025, 23:29:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vtk28m$2ajj$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/14/25 4:08 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/14/25 1:09 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
Muddying the waters by U.S. News media is still in high gear :) Reuters, Bloomberg, Fox, some U.S. Generals, and scores of female "journalists", .. :-) Hahhahhahh :)
>
Scared pussy-locked, huh? :) Motherfucking traitors.
>
They've ruined USA and have the nerve to show it too now. Put their names on it!
>
There's a talk that next place for coming Saturday's meeting might be in Rome, but arranged and conducted by Ommani foreign minister again.
>
   No.
 Spokesman of Iran's foreign ministry again warned people not to read the media about _anything_ on Iran-USA talks. He said the 2nd round will again be in Omman.
 Reuters, Axios, Bloomberg, Fox, Yahoo News, The Times of Israel, and even an Iranian owned news agency "Mehr News Agency" all lied right into people's faces about it.
 It looks suspicious. Mehr might be an inadvertent "double agent" kind of news outlet, working for Israel and at the same time getting tricked or outright used by Iran's intelligence into revealing who copies news from who, and therefore who's connected to Israel.
 Mehr is semi official too, it says :) Hehe :) Now I know there are a lot of Iranians in Israel. But looks like sometimes at least you don't even have to be in Israel to manipulate them. You could even be part of Iran's government and trick them into doing what you want :)
   
The most interesting piece of news though, is that Araghchi is going to Moscow _before_ the 2nd round of talks with Americans this coming Saturday..
This can be revealing to some extent of at least a few aspects of reality of what's going on:
1- Russia had no control on Iran's stance delivered to USA in the first round. Nobody did. The decisions were all owned and decided by Iranians. In fact the most important ones of them, as what should even be discussed and what shouldn't. So this is not what Russia, an important member of the past deal (which is still in effect, in some respects), had any influence on.
2- The 2nd round, also involves areas contingent on agreements with Russia. So Araghchi must settle them with Russians just like he'd have to with the Americans. It might seem settling some matters with Russians might be easier than with the Americans but I think this is a mistake. In fact it is more involved. Having constructive relations with Russians _adds_ to the negotiating work Araghchi must conduct with Russians.
3- In some respects, Putin might take Trump's side in this deal. Especially in stuff related to Israel. Russia has a very close relationship with Israelis. So it has been necessary, even more necessary than meeting Americans, to settle some issues with Russia before talking to Americans.
4- Araghchi is the main negotiator. As far as the news of it says, nobody else is going with him to Moscow. Or, the issue to be discussed there is very narrow and very sensitive at the same time. So it is pretty straightforward. That's how sometimes only one man is sent for the talks, like for example Witkoff handling a lot of stuff all by himself. They didn't even involve the secretary of state in them.
I think, by a very good probability, Iran acquired a few H-bombs from Russia in November of 2023, when scale of mass murder in Ghaza went up and a lot of intentions about the region, in the future plans of Israel and USA was revealed. And I think, since November 2023, Iran has been trying mighty hard to build H-bombs herself. She's always done that with defensive equipment immediately after receiving prototypes from other countries. As early as 1985 (Scuds), or even earlier in the 1930s (German rifles, etc), and even earlier than that in the Safavid period (canons, early rifles, etc). As soon as they put their hands on a nice defensive weapon, they begin not only making it, but improving upon it. Some of Iran-made G3 rifles were far better than G3s Germans made. And before that, some models of Brno rifles Iranians made were superior to those made in Germany and Czechoslovakia. And original scuds Iran got from Korea (via Libya, not directly) are now like scrap metal compared to some of Iran's newest missiles that are evolved from scuds.
So if the above paragraph is the actual case, Araghchi must settle that matter with Russia, either telling Putin Iran will not stop making them and that Russia and any nation other than Iran would have to live with that, and collect Russia's stance on it (cause if Russia disagrees, there's no point discussing it with Americans); or, telling Putin Iran is willing to reduce the rate of their productions and that it's all Iran can do about it, and collect Putin's stance on it.
I'm saying this, because H-bombs are Iran's lifeline. She needs H-bombs a 100 times more than USA needs H-bombs. You can be any creature on earth you want, it won't change that fact. She will continue to build more and more of them. Do you want to blame it on something? Blame it on your fucking Nazi selves. You'd be right too, doing that.
Heck, Iran might even abandon the talks if Putin disagrees with that. If Russia does not let that, Russia is every bit as good as USA or Israel or any other country in the world, and Iran must take care of herself.
If it gets to that point, your options will be to go fuck yourselves. It doesn't matter who you are. She _breathes_ at all for the exact same reasons, so yes, you'll have the option to go fuck yourselves if you don't "agree" with her breathing.
And if you or anybody gets too rude and selfish with her, it will be war. Iranians will fight you and your cohorts combined with what they have now, and more; and for as long as it takes to fuck you and your people up. I estimate it to be around 30 years of war, after which you won't find an "Israel" anywhere on the planet Earth, not _one_ American military base in the Asia and Europe.
5- If Araghchi and his team make it to the coming Saturday round 2 of the talks, then Putin's stance must've been agreeable to Iran.
So let's wait and see if round 2 happens :)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)64Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)58Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9%
12 Mar 25  i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25  i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4%
13 Mar 25  i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25  i i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25  i  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)41Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25   i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar 25    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)31Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25      +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr 25      i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 25      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)22Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25               `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25                `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25                 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25                  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25                   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25                    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
12 Apr05:15                     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)11Physfitfreak
12 Apr05:29                      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
12 Apr18:35                       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
12 Apr22:09                        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
13 Apr02:49                         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
13 Apr16:47                          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
14 Apr19:09                           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
14 Apr22:08                            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
14 Apr23:29                             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
15 Apr16:53                              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Apr02:38                               `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal