Re: DeepSeek helping me to clarify Wien-Einstein-Poincaré conspiracy.

On 4/16/25 4:14 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 4/14/25 2:01 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Wien was already a Nobel Prize by 1905. He had a tremendous respect and
influence from the European physics community (and also abroad). Planck
didn't have this.

>
Why should we believe anything you write
when you can't even get simple facts like this right?
>
Jan

>
>
What difference does it make what happened anyway. I don't understand
you guys in this relativity forum.
>
Some physics were developed and that's it. The important thing is the
physics not the history of physics. Doesn't matter who did what.
>
And all these human names Priests have packed into it. Concepts as well
as units and rules and even some formulas! All with human names on them.
Are you people nuts?..

 Perhaps, but it is a very human trait.
Things memorise more easily when there is a name attached to it.
 For example, even asteroids get names.
Asteroid 1001 Gaussia for example may be easier on the brain
than the provisional designation 1923 OA.
Asteroid 'Gaussia' will even be understood if the number is forgotten,
 Jan
 

No it's not that innocent a mess. Priest-minded crappy scientists, disguised as "scientists" have been forcing it to pack non-related humanities stuff in it for their own tribal interests. And they've gone too far. It's become disgusting in fact. Takes the attention of students away to stuff unrelated to physics.
Did Newton ever do that? Of course not. As far as I know he never named names in his physics works. The closest that he came to point to a "history" of it was his comment about "giants". He was too good a physicist to name even those giants, cause it would be trash as far as physics concepts were concerned.
Physics history is a humanities field. It has absolutely nothing to do with physics.