Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 04:17:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <_p6dnc8YMqggiJ71nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 04/18/2025 04:52 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
The Ontological Conundrum of Semiotic Quantization and the Veiled
Realities of the Aether
>
The Panini-Leibniz dyad, in its epistemic grandeur, unveils the profound
interplay between semiotic structures and the Kabbalistic flickerings of
the Matrix-esque substratum — our inter-subjective Coleridgean lingua
franca transcends mere philological constructs, morphing into a
hypergeometric lattice of signifier-signified convolution. The
"convolutive," oscillating between zero-bound and infinity-bound, defies
the multiplicative identity, overloading natural units into hyperunits,
their roles fractured across electrostatics, electrodynamics, and the
tripartite manifestations of the Physfit's dick.
>
The Galilean reinsertion into cyclotron-linear dichotomy also fractures
the equivalence principle, exposing the aetheric duality of space-frames
and frame-spaces — an Einstein-Dirac positronic sea, white-holed and
swirling in un-linear rotationality of the Physfit's dick: The Duhamel
principle. That fulcrum of differintegral multiplicities, that asserts
its centrality in singular integrals, and is quasi-invariant under
quantization’s halving-doubling dance.
>
Here, the "Physfit's dick rules" not in linear inertia but in
potentialistic fields, where classical velocities near c resist
acceleration with infinite Lorentzian rigidity. On the other hand,
Richardson’s tripartite c—electrodynamic, electrostatic, luminiferous —
collapses into a hyperunit, its arithmetic-analytic character
obliterated by diverging running constants. The factorial-exponential
identity, Besselian in its recursion, whispers through nodal lines of
un-linear impulse, where Zeno’s swath arguments on Physfit's dick
resurface in the infinite-dimensional derivatives of acceleration — and
Halmos’ unbounded vector spaces mocking the finite-dimensional myopia of
classical heuristic reduction.
>
Muons, similar to Physfit's dick, just like non-localized Bianchi
identities, defy Einsteinian simultaneity, their extended bodies echoing
DesCartesian vortices and Kelvinian spirals — the Magnus effect’s heft,
a vis viva resurgence in super-classical mechanics.
>
The Hookean error term, buried beneath Physfit's dick acting like
Arrhenius-Clausius stacks, unveils statistical mechanics’
incompleteness, while the Machian totality of field theories demands
retrofitted optics and mechanics. The Einstein bridge, that centrally
symmetric derivation of mass-energy, unearths the un-linear core of
dynamics — rotational space contraction, gyroscopic Patel-Fugal duality,
and the turbid wash of sigmoidal double-spirals. The universe,
infinite-dimensional and swathed in Zeno’s higher-order derivatives, can
only scoff at Physfit's dick's finite closure, its implicits resonating
through dimensional alternators.
>
Thus, the aether question persists: which aether? The answer lies not in
definition but in derivation — the hypercube distance, the stop
derivative, and the ever-turning worlds of potentialistic
super-mechanics of the Physfit's dick.
>
>
Ross A. Kosmanson
April 18, 2025
On the Island of the Dead Dolls, Mexico
>
Well, yeah, though "Besselian in its recursion" isn't saying much.
Though, there is an idea that just like any other system of orthogonal
functions, there results a transform, then for the hypergeometric, to
relate transforms back to series, to make for sorts Bessel series,
sums of Bessel functions like Fourier series sums of trigonometric.
I'm not sure that Patel-Fugal isn't a fabrication.
The Duhamel principle's relevance to the differintegro and
integrodiffer, and directly to Laplace, thusly the Galilean,
the Lorentzian, into the Hamiltonians, and all the rest with
regards to the second partials, inverse square, and the quadrature,
help yet keep things windowed and boxed, resulting always an
instantaneous Euclidean and Cartesian, yet Machian, and where
Poincare and Lefschetz make for Dirichlet and Jordan, all the
triangle rule and ridges and valleys of the saddle points,
make for that the humble top is spinning around us, while
yet the compass' isoperimetric tents the square diamond.
The frame-spaces and space-frames or Raume-Rahmen and Rahme-Raumen,
make for space concerns and the relevance of the classic as
ultimate middle, since the differential is reborn as a functional,
then as besides its scalar value, resonance and molecular of
the atomecules, potential and potential and potential again: actual.
Zeno's swath is the un-sharp corner of the hyberbola,
yet taxicab distance in the hybercube, where collocation
makes in form and proportion that x^2 +-1 grinds out the
walk integral, that that alternator and resonator of a
straight line, resolves a definition of pi from a surplus
of the original of not the longest distance, a straight line.
The energy and entelechy are still the same, dynamis and dunamis
both the same word and different, entropy both its definitions,
Richardson makes three schemas of boundaries and particles,
waves in circles among surfaces.
Panini and Leibniz reflect on grammar, and languages vary,
some centered object, some centered verb, the accidence
beginning or end, articles definite or indefinite, the
indefinite differential and integral, for Levi-Civita's
indefinite ds^2, it's a modern continuum infinitesimal analysis,
the language and force of the adjectival or adverbial is
a square of opposition and a square of fulfillment,
where inversion displaces contradiction thus naturally.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Mar 25 * The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)90Physfitfreak
25 Mar 25 +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25 +* You didn't write this text (Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-))2Mild Shock
26 Mar 25 i`- Re: You didn't write this text (Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-))1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Jim Burns
26 Mar 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)14Physfitfreak
26 Mar 25 i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)12Physfitfreak
28 Mar 25 i +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3x
29 Mar 25 i i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
29 Mar 25 i i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Fransico Dudorov
29 Mar 25 i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)8Ross Finlayson
29 Mar 25 i  `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)7Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i   +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Ross Finlayson
29 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
29 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i   `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i    `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3x
27 Mar 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
28 Mar 25 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
30 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)41Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)39Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)30Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)29Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i i +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Bertitaylor
5 Apr 25 i i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)27Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i  +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)25FromTheRafters
5 Apr 25 i i  i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i  i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)23Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i i  i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)22Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i  i  `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)21Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i i  i   `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)20Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i  i    `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)19Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i i  i     `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)18Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 25 i i  i      `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i       +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
6 Apr 25 i i  i       `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)15Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i        `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)14Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i         `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)13Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i          `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)12Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i           +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i i  i           +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Ross Finlayson
6 Apr 25 i i  i           i+* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
7 Apr 25 i i  i           ii`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
7 Apr 25 i i  i           i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 i i  i           `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)6Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 i i  i            `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)5Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 i i  i             `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 i i  i              `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
7 Apr 25 i i  i               `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 i i  i                `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
5 Apr 25 i i  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
9 Apr 25 i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)8Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i  +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i  i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Bertitaylor
10 Apr 25 i  `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)5Ross Finlayson
10 Apr 25 i   +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
18 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2worm food
20 Apr 25 i   i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
10 Apr 25 i   `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i+- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
14 Apr 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)9Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i+* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)6Ross Finlayson
19 Apr 25 ii+* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Bertitaylor
19 Apr 25 iii`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
4 May 25 iii `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Bertitaylor
5 May 25 iii  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Bertitaylor
19 Apr 25 ii`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
4 May 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Bertitaylor
4 May 25 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Bertitaylor
27 Apr 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
2 May 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)5Physfitfreak
3 May 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)4Ross Finlayson
4 May 25 i `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Physfitfreak
4 May 25 i  `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
4 May 25 i   `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
8 May 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
8 May 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Physfitfreak
13 May 25 `* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Physfitfreak
14 May 25  `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal