Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 23:19:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <vu17h3$8kcv$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/19/25 2:37 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 4/19/25 1:59 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
>
>
An Iranian more independent and self-centered news outlet (in Telegram) which does not necessarily obey any demands on them by Iran's government, early on, towards the beginning of the talk disclosed that Araghchi and his team had cancelled the talk minutes into its start, and for about 15 minutes or so were preparing to leave the building (Ommani embassy in Italy) and return to Iran.
>
This news piece was not touched on at the end of the 2nd rounds talks by spokesperson of foreign ministry. No other Iranian sources of news also touched on that, either because they didn't have the information, or they followed ministry's directive in keeping it quiet. No news of it in Western outlets that I could see either.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
  In this round of talk, no reporters were allowed in the building. Even spokesperson himself wasn't allowed to be there. And I don't think anyone among Iran's team texted this out directly to that news agency. It'd be absurd to do that. Much more likely, Araghchi himself called up other Iran's authorities to ask for permission to abort, and it was granted. Then some Iranians in the government itself immediately leaked it to that news agency against the wishes of the government.
 There's a second route also. Perhaps some Mossad agent among Americans' team texted it out to Mossad, and Iran's spies among Mossad (plenty of them!) texted it to that news agency and perhaps scores of other ones as well, then only the most independent one disclosed it in Telegram. I think these two are the only routes that the news could take to come out.
 I saw the news piece just minutes after the attempt to abort took place! I.e. during those minutes that mission was aborted. This is a bit too fast to be normal reaction on either side. I think there's more to it than it seems.
 How it was handled _after_ 2nd round was over, was of course just correct diplomatic behavior preserving both sides' face. Such nitty gritties are washed and cleaned off before news to media is given. But the fact that somebody, some side, wanted very badly and quickly for it to come out, is the strange and interesting part of it :)
 Could be that somebody will explain this in the news for a wider audience. We'll see.
 
On the official Iranian news channel whose reporter woman was in Rome broadcasting live from outside the place of meeting, the only clue that could point to this event is that she said (live cast) spokesperson was called inside and despite arrangements made between them to relay the news to the woman reporter, she was saying he had gone silent for the past few minutes and is not responding to our queries. Then she herself concluded that "talks may have started to cover very serious matters, taking all spokesman's attention." :) This is the only sign that you could see in Iran's official news.
Anyway, this thing isn't deserving all this attention and I'm already sick of it. As far as my own view is concerned, as I've said it multiple times, it doesn't matter how this talk "goes forward" or even is kept going or not. This whole thing to contact and create a dialogue with the Americans is inconsequential to Iran because regardless of the outcome, Iran must and would do exactly what she should, with or without a talk. There aren't "choices" there for Iran to think and choose from when Nazis are pressuring her.
In fact this is also the stance of Pezeshkiyan and Iran's Leader himself. Both of them have pointed out that this matter of "negotiation" is one among tens of other tasks that foreign ministry is involved in and does not absorb any more attention than that, and some people's tying the events or their decisions and plans to it is ridiculous.
Talking with Americans is not consequential for Iran, and therefore, it is not consequential _to_ Iran. End of this crap story.
Talking with Russia is, and talking with China is, and similarly developing ties with central Asians and Arabs and Indians and central and south Americans ARE consequential for (and to) Iran.
USA and its cohorts and to tell you the truth the whole fucking cro-magnon people is a thing of the past for Iran. It was over decades ago.
Here let me one more time quote Raisi on that:
    "They are the past; we are the future. I repeat, they are the past, and we are the future."
                    - Raisi in delivering his speech in UN

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Mar 25 * Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)168Physfitfreak
5 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Bertietaylor
10 Mar 25 i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1bertitaylor
5 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1vallor
9 Mar 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)58Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9%
12 Mar 25 ii i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 ii ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25 ii i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25 ii i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4%
13 Mar 25 ii i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25 ii i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 ii i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 ii  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25 ii  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)41Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25 i i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25 i i     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)33Physfitfreak
29 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
30 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)31Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i    +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Chris M. Thomasson
1 Apr 25 i    i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i     +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)23Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)22Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)20Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i             `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i              `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
6 Apr 25 i               `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Physfitfreak
10 Apr 25 i                 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
11 Apr 25 i                  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)12Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)11Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)10Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
12 Apr 25 i                      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
13 Apr 25 i                        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                          `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
14 Apr 25 i                           `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
15 Apr 25 i                            `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 i                             `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)49Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Thomas Heger
17 Apr 25 ii`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
17 Apr 25 ii   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
18 Apr 25 ii     `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)39Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)38Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)37Physfitfreak
19 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
20 Apr 25 i   i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)30Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)29Physfitfreak
21 Apr 25 i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)28Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)27Physfitfreak
23 Apr 25 i       +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
23 Apr 25 i       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)24Physfitfreak
24 Apr 25 i         +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
25 Apr 25 i         i`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 i         `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)21Thomas Heger
26 Apr 25 i          +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)19bertietaylor
2 May 25 i          i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Thomas Heger
4 May 25 i          i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)17Bertitaylor
6 May 25 i          i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Thomas Heger
7 May 25 i          i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)15Bertitaylor
7 May 25 i          i    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)14Thomas Heger
7 May 25 i          i     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Bertitaylor
8 May 25 i          i      +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Thomas Heger
9 May 25 i          i      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Thomas Heger
27 Apr 25 i          `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
26 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
27 Apr 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
30 Apr 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
1 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7Physfitfreak
2 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
4 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
6 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)18Physfitfreak
7 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
9 May 25 +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
11 May 25 +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
13 May 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal