Re: Theory determines what we observe. --Albert Einstein

On 4/22/2025 12:58 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 > On 4/21/25 2:52 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >> On 4/21/2025 9:34 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>> On 4/21/25 2:11 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>> On 4/21/2025 9:03 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>> On 4/21/25 1:25 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>>>> On 4/21/2025 8:05 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>>>> On 4/21/25 1:29 AM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
 >>>>>>>> On 4/20/2025 9:12 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>>  >> Werner Heisenberg said, "We have to remember that what we observe is not
 >>>>>>>>  >> nature in itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>> What we observe - is a claim. It's
 >>>>>>>> a text information. It submits our
 >>>>>>>> rules of text processing, nature
 >>>>>>>> "in itself"  has nothing to do with
 >>>>>>>> it and never had.
 >>>>>>>> And, yes - a theory teaches us how
 >>>>>>>> our observation should look like.
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> "Text information" is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> No it is not. Without a trained by a culture
 >>>>>> human mind able to interprete it it's either
 >>>>>> a stream of meaningless sounds or a stream
 >>>>>> of meaningless characters, Bozo.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> "a stream of meaningless sounds" is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>>>
 >>>> But a text isn't that.
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Anything that is, is nature in itself, Bozo.
 >>
 >> No, Bozo.
 >> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nature
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 > There is a difference between the English language and physics, Bozo.
Yes, physicists are too stupid to deal
with the communication protocols of sane
people. So are wannabe  physicists, Bozo.