Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.

On 05/03/2025 03:02 PM, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2025 21:17:30 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

You have some problems with text comprehension. Also, your
micro-temporary memory doesn't help you. That's why you live from old
memories. Aging took a toll from you.
>
I clearly wrote: "Angular momentum IS NOT CONSERVED on Earth. MAYBE, AND
LOCALLY, in
outer space and up to Mars".
>
>
FRICTION, PROK, FRICTION! (among several other factors like air drag,
quantum effects, etc.).
>
ANGULAR AND LINEAR MOMENTUM ARE CONSERVED (MAYBE) IN THE LOCAL OUTER
SPACE.
>
>
Remember: FRICTION, AMONG OTHER THINGS, PREVENT THAT MOMENTUM BE
CONSERVED ON EARTH.

>
Wrong, Richard.
>
The angular momentum of a rotating object does not disappear due
to friction, but gets dispersed even down to the molecular level.
>
If you spin up a gyroscope in an "anti-earthwise" direction, the
whole Earth slows in its rotation. Then, as the angular momentum
is dispersed due to air friction, the whole Earth eventually speeds
back up, but the speed-up of the Earth is not necessarily immediate
because the angular momentum is first dispersed in whirls and
vortices of the air.
>
If you spin the gyroscope in vacuum, the coupling between the
gyroscope's rotation and the Earth's rotation due to friction with
the bearings is more immediate.
>
Conservation of angular momentum applies to a CLOSED SYSTEM.
It is nonsense to claim that it is not conserved because individual
components of the closed system may speed up or slow down.

Yeah, "momentum is conserved, ..., 'in the open'", though it really
needs a usually more thorough account that any impulse is always
nominally, "un-linear".
"Conservation of momentum" is not quite really a thing, it's true.
Of course this contradicts many texts. Yet, they're sort of
classically ignorant.