Re: Yes, the old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy

Maciej Woźniak wrote:

On 5/4/2025 12:35 AM, Tim Takács wrote:

Maciej Woźniak wrote:

On 5/3/2025 11:10 PM, Vidal Kachanovsky wrote:

Maciej Woźniak wrote:

On 5/3/2025 9:04 PM, Anil Movsarov Dikarevsky wrote:

Maciej Woźniak wrote:

On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
    > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
    > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day to last
    > 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
That's right - the clocks made for serious measurements are
adjusted (calibrated) to count seconds of 1/86400 of a mean solar
day. See, poor idiots - common sense has been warning you.

>
impossible.

>
Yet that's what is happening. Common sense has been warning you.

>
why are you deleting the proof, you stupid khazar goy. You cant
divide anything without an agreed standard unit or entity.

>
But "agrreed standard unit"  is not the idiocy physics is trying to
enforce. Common sense has been warning you.

 
that's not the point.

 
Yes, that's the point.

okay, jew. I give you a 'solar_day' the way you want it, and nothing else.
Come back with your second, in duration of a second. Fucking idiot.