Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS A HOAX.

On 05/04/2025 04:37 PM, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Sun, 4 May 2025 6:29:49 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>

On 5/3/25 3:22 PM, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

>

I used to enjoy chatting with you. Now I am merely sad.

>
>
Hmm.. If you have noticed such gradual change for the worse in his
understanding of physics, then I might have to review and update my
assessment that he is a high school drop out.
>
If you are correct, then he may even have an advanced degree in physics
from years back.

>
He was an electrical engineer, apparently a good one. He had worked
his way up to a team lead and then a managerial position.
>

I rarely ever read something he posted (only very recently I've visited
relativity forum) so didn't have a chance to detect a gradual mental
decline in him.
>
Now my question. How do you know it is not caused by, say, advanced
alcoholism or some other form of substance abuse?

>
I don't know. But I would guess not.
>

Why are you comparing
his case to that of a person who's undergoing gradual "dementia."?

>
He'd never slipped up on basic first-semester physics before.

You know why all inductive thinkers think alike?
Assume they don't, ....
The problem of induction usually follows, assume they do.
Anyways the very notion of "fictitious forces"
is a large waffling about the otherwise principled.