On 16/04/2026 15:52, olcott wrote:From one month until the end of Summer.On 4/16/2026 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:Does that "soon" mean less than 50 years ?On 15/04/2026 15:02, olcott wrote:>On 4/15/2026 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:>>>
But it is indeed true that I don't believe in conclusions if it
is not known whether the premises are true. And I don't believe
that ad-hominem can be a part of a valid argument, although it
might be a basis to reject a testimnoy.
Like I said until you become an expert in
proof theoretic semantics you will remain
a clueless wonder.
Not quite. I will remain a wonderer. You will remain clueless.
It will soon be an easily verified fact that all
my ideas have always been fully anchored in modern
Proof Theoretic Semantics.
I have three enormous construction projects
on my house that also must be done in that
same time-frame and my car just broke down
again. Because I am very poor I must do all
this work myself.
I am as a matter of objective fact a genius.I will write a new paper that specifically anchorsA good paper would not give any reason to think that the author may
each of my ideas point-by-point and item-by-item
in direct quotes from foundational papers in Proof
Theoretic Semantics. This is easy to do, yet takes
time to get it exactly right.
be stupid or ignorant.
The key thing that I have been missing is
a succinct set of terms-of-the-art that refer
to the exact meanings that I intend. Outside
of PTS there is no such set of terms-of-the-art.
--
Copyright 2026 Olcott
My 28 year goal has been to make
"true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.
The complete structure of this system is now defined.
This required establishing a new foundation
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.