| Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 17/04/2026 17:34, olcott wrote:My 28 year goal has been to makeOn 4/17/2026 1:52 AM, Mikko wrote:In such situations it is best to work on problem you want to completeOn 16/04/2026 15:52, olcott wrote:>On 4/16/2026 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 15/04/2026 15:02, olcott wrote:>On 4/15/2026 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:>>>
But it is indeed true that I don't believe in conclusions if it
is not known whether the premises are true. And I don't believe
that ad-hominem can be a part of a valid argument, although it
might be a basis to reject a testimnoy.
Like I said until you become an expert in
proof theoretic semantics you will remain
a clueless wonder.
Not quite. I will remain a wonderer. You will remain clueless.
It will soon be an easily verified fact that all
my ideas have always been fully anchored in modern
Proof Theoretic Semantics.
Does that "soon" mean less than 50 years ?
From one month until the end of Summer.
I have three enormous construction projects
on my house that also must be done in that
same time-frame and my car just broke down
again. Because I am very poor I must do all
this work myself.
>>I will write a new paper that specifically anchors>
each of my ideas point-by-point and item-by-item
in direct quotes from foundational papers in Proof
Theoretic Semantics. This is easy to do, yet takes
time to get it exactly right.
A good paper would not give any reason to think that the author may
be stupid or ignorant.
I am as a matter of objective fact a genius.
The key thing that I have been missing is
a succinct set of terms-of-the-art that refer
to the exact meanings that I intend. Outside
of PTS there is no such set of terms-of-the-art.
first, if possible. If somethen prevents working on that problme then
on what you want to complete next.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.