| Liste des Groupes | Revenir à c theory |
On 03/07/2026 21:36, olcott wrote:The output really should be based on the inputOn 7/3/2026 1:18 PM, dbush wrote:On 7/3/2026 2:10 PM, olcott wrote:On 7/3/2026 12:10 PM, dbush wrote:>On 7/3/2026 12:52 PM, olcott wrote:Ignoring the input IS NOT A MAPPINGOn 7/3/2026 10:50 AM, dbush wrote:>On 7/3/2026 11:36 AM, olcott wrote:>On 7/3/2026 4:22 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 02/07/2026 17:51, olcott wrote:>>>
Do you know enough about C to understand that
dbush example was foolish nonsense when proposed
to show the halting problem counter-example?
It is a valid example of a C program. It was present as a part of a
claim about you, and your response was the false claim that "That
is just nonsense". Later in the discussion you offer more evidence
to support his claim.
>
His halt decider did not look at its input.
Nor is it required to. All it needs to do is map inputs to outputs.
>
So a piece of metal sitting on the ground is an automobile.
Does algorithm H map machine description X and machine input Y to an output of either 0 or 1?
>
>
If an algorithm takes an input and produces an output, that is by definition a mapping.That only proves that the definition is incoherent.Your definitions often are. But the well known definition of "mapping"
is not.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.