Sujet : Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic sci.math comp.ai.philosophyDate : 23. Jun 2025, 04:05:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103ag9k$10fmp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/22/2025 9:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/22/25 10:05 PM, olcott wrote:
Since one year ago ChatGPT increased its token limit
from 4,000 to 128,000 so that now "understands" the
complete proof of the DD example shown below.
>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
*This seems to be the complete HHH(DD) that includes HHH(DDD)*
https://chatgpt.com/share/6857286e-6b48-8011-91a9-9f6e8152809f
>
ChatGPT agrees that I have correctly refuted every halting
problem proof technique that relies on the above pattern.
>
>
Which begins with the LIE:
Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until
it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern.
ChatGPT does not know anything about my work besides
what I told it on those 38 pages.
Since I am stipulating the definition of a simulating
termination analyzer and this definition is coherent
this definition cannot possibly be incorrect.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis