Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : comp.ai.philosophy sci.math sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Apr 2026, 02:15:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <8cOcnYz-B4VUPUT0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In these sorts of accounts, thusly, there is a strong critique
that any putative candidate for Foundations is either this "theatheory",
or at best incomplete: and in matters of completions
of continuity and infinity: provided counterexamples.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Apr 26 * Theatheory: super-theory and natural science34Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 26 `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science33Ross Finlayson
6 Apr 26  `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science32Ross Finlayson
6 Apr 26   `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science31Ross Finlayson
8 Apr 26    +- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
8 Apr 26    +* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science28Ross Finlayson
8 Apr 26    i`* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science27Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 26    i +* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science18Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 26    i i`* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science17Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 26    i i +- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 26    i i `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science15Maciej Woźniak
11 Apr 26    i i  `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science14Ross Finlayson
11 Apr 26    i i   +- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 26    i i   +* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science4Ross Finlayson
12 Apr 26    i i   i`* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science3Maciej Woźniak
12 Apr 26    i i   i `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science2Maciej Woźniak
12 Apr 26    i i   i  `- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Maciej Woźniak
12 Apr 26    i i   `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science8Thomas Heger
13 Apr 26    i i    `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science7Thomas Heger
17 Apr 26    i i     `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science6Thomas Heger
17 Apr 26    i i      +- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Maciej Woźniak
17 Apr 26    i i      `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science4Ross Finlayson
17 Apr 26    i i       +* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science2x3
18 Apr 26    i i       i`- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
18 Apr 26    i i       `- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Thomas Heger
12 Apr 26    i `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science8Ross Finlayson
13 Apr 26    i  `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science7Ross Finlayson
15 Apr 26    i   `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science6Ross Finlayson
18 Apr 26    i    `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science5Ross Finlayson
18 Apr 26    i     `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science4Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 26    i      `* Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science3Ross Finlayson
21 Apr 26    i       +- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
1 May17:11    i       `- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Ross Finlayson
9 Apr 26    `- Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal