| Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Thomas Heger wrote:Actually I did and heard about the 'infinite monkey theorem' before.>You obvisoluly never heard of...
Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 19:29 schrieb The Starmaker:Thomas Heger wrote:>>>
Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:52 schrieb Maciej Woźniak:On 4/11/2026 3:33 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:>On 04/11/2026 05:23 AM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:>On 4/11/2026 8:37 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:>On 04/10/2026 10:41 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:>Natural and science make an oxymoron, sorry.>
>
Science is "natural" like numbers are "natural",
since for "first principles" and "final cause"
that according to "science" that those are "science",
and here, "logic".
Your arm waving won't help, natural and
science make an oxymoron.
>
If it's not natural, then it's synthetic.
The only reason people think science is synthetic
is because they were told some vague reasoning
about paradoxes and the limitations of sense,
Why don't monkeys have any science?
>
They have, but not yet have invented the printing press.
>
TH
Well, how did the monkies come up with the Complete Works of Shakespeare
then?
Monkeys cannot speak very well.
>
But some gorillas have learned to 'speak' with hand signs.
>
But that is difficult to print, anyhow.
>
Possibly you could teach a gorilla to use a printing press, but I have
doubts about their possibility to write, if the gorilla cannot speak.
>
But maybe a system based on pictograms could be a way to allow the apes
to express their emotions, transfer that to some printable form and
subsequently squeeze it on paper.
>
TH
>
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
look at the picture of a monkey who cannot speak but can type...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.